Posted by Chris on June 29, 2008 under Sermons
Noticing the important things we can easily take for granted …
It is very easy to overlook and take for granted that which is critical. We do not notice air until we find we cannot breathe. We do not notice water until we are extremely thirsty.I recall a moment when I needed water and quenching of thirst as never before or since. It was right here in this auditorium in 1989. Karen and I were newlyweds and we were attending a marriage seminar led by Paul and Gladys Faulkner and Carl and Smitty Brecheen. I had had dental work the day before and used a mouthwash as part of my treatment. It dried my mouth out and left a bitter taste. I sat in the audience and noticed something that to many people would have been ignored. Right next to the podium was a clear pitcher of water. It was filled with ice water and the sides were sweating. I kept staring at the condensation and the water and my mouth got drier and drier. I couldn’t get up easily because we were mid-pew – I didn’t want to disturb everyone. But I was tempted to stand up, ask a question and say, “By the way, could I have a drink.” Who else would have noticed the pitcher of water …
Take a look at the banner that hangs in the back of our auditorium. We went to the effort to make this because we find that it’s message is important and gives us purpose. What does it say?
“Making Disciples for Jesus Who are Eager to Serve Others”
Where does this statement come from? Matthew 28:16-20 and Titus 2:13-15
We often call Matthew 28:16-20 the Great Commission. Simply calling this text “The Great Commission” is a reductionism. It makes it simple to reference, but we can start referencing it by shorthand so much that we neglect what it is saying. We overlook it.
It is easy for us to reduce important matters of faith so that we lose the richness and fullness.
Notice first of all that the setting is very general … “As you are going … .” Going where? Anywhere. Doesn’t really matter. Wherever you go. While you are out and about. The modern missionary movement has emphasized the “GO YE” and the nations. However, nations in this context isn’t the same concept of nation that we have. I don’t want to discredit what missionaries do. Not at all, we need to encourage them. But when we think this statement only applies to them, then we aren’t reading it correctly.
The emphasis is on making disciples. Now what is a disciple? We may think that a disciple is a recruit or a member. It’s someone who signed up. It’s a sale, a buyer, a fish. Jesus spoke a lot about evangelism and being part of the community of Christians, but he uses this word disciple. Why? A disciple is a “learner.” It’s a rather Jewish word. Disciples/learners followed rabbis/teachers. You had to make the cut to be a disciple. But Jesus makes learners out of those who will follow. Jesus wants his learners to make learners and he even wants them to make learners out of those gentile tribes – the outsiders. Jesus was interest in his followers learning more than just information …
Make “learners” – What does it mean to be a learner? What do we learn?
Stanley Shipp – Like all preachers, Stanley has an airplane story. While sitting on his seat a man boarded late. He was in a horrible temper and he was pushing and shoving. He was rude to the flight attendants and complaining. Stanley was thinking, “This man is going to sit by me.” And sure enough he did. The man grumped at Stanley and said something like, “Well, I guess this is my seat, right?” Just then the flight attendant came to the man urging him to get situated because the plan needed to take off. The man yelled at the woman, “I’m trying. Quit bothering me.” He opened up the over head compartment and tried to fit his stuff in it. He took off his jacket and tried to cram it in the compartment. It wouldn’t fit and the door wouldn’t close. The attendant said, “We really need to close that door. It’s regulation.” And as the man argued with the woman who was just doing her job, Stanley got up and moved his bags around. He fit the man’s bags in more neatly. And then he took the man’s jacket and folded it nicely. Now the compartment door closed just as it should. Stanley sat down. The flight attendant sat down. And finally the man sat down. Somewhat humbled, the man introduced himself to Stanley. Not quite saying “thank you” but trying to show gratitude he turned to Stanley and said, “So what do you do for a living?” Stanley said, “I’m a teacher. I teach people how to live.” The man said, “Well, get to teaching. I need it.”
That story makes us aware of what the aim of evangelism and discipleship is really about. Stanley didn’t have to ask the man, “So where will you spend eternity?” When our view of discipleship is reduced to the hereafter, then we can neglect the here and now.
When we think of a disciple as a learner, then we recognize that Jesus’ focus was on the here and now and the hereafter both. How we live now is a seamless continuity with the future.
- Learners are people who are baptized into Jesus and live like Jesus. They are always in development and under construction. They practice life in Christ.
- The Great Commission never claims to be the most important Scripture in the Bible. It reflects back on everything Jesus did and taught … it assumes that you know what Jesus taught, or it assumes that you are going to learn it.
- Being a learner means that the way we live and the way we interact with each other matters – even now.
- Being a disciple is not membership in a group insurance plan.
- It isn’t a fast-pass to heaven.
What are we learning? We are learning to do everything that Jesus taught us. Much more than information or special knowledge, we are learning a way of living and a way of living together
That’s pretty obvious in the Titus [2:11-14] text – For the grace of God that brings salvation has appeared to everyone. It teaches us to say “No” to ungodliness and worldly passions, and to live self-controlled, upright and godly lives in this present age, while we wait for the blessed hope-the glorious appearing of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ, who gave himself for us to redeem us from all wickedness and to purify for himself a people that are his very own, eager to do what is good.
Do you see the way that here and now and hereafter combine? Do you see the way that information and formation come together. Do you see how the grace and hope in Christ becomes a tendency to do good eagerly?
Tonight at our family meeting we want to introduce you to a focus for our regional ministry.
This isn’t everything we do. This isn’t a limitation. It is a focus. It isn’t a reduction because each of these four is about fulfilling our purpose to make learners.
We are inviting people to be learners with us. Not simply getting some facts straight so that we can ace our final exam, rather we are learning how to live. Inviting college students to learn what really matters. Teaching our kids at every stage what it means to be like Jesus. Learning to be like Christ brings healing to our broken lives. We learn to have hope.
It begins with baptism and then it continues in a life of learning. Not just learning about Jesus, but learning from him. For he is with us always – here and now and in the hereafter.
Posted by Chris on June 22, 2008 under Sermons
Please ask Chris Benjamin for permission before reproducing
any of the images, graphics, or charts on this page. |
Issues and Labels
- Conservative and Liberal
- Traditional and Progressive
- Spectrum:
— “Angry Reactionaries”
— “Cautious Moderates”
— “Manipulative Change Agents”
The Union of 1832
T. B. Larimore
- Born July 10, 1843
- East Tennessee
- Baptized 1864 in Hopkinsville, Kentucky
- Attended Franklin College in Nashville, Tennessee
Mars Hill Academy
- Florence, Alabama
- 1871 – 1887
- An influential evangelist and educator
- F. D. Srygley, Larimore and His Boys
The Issues – Then
- Instrumental Music in Worship
- Missionary Society
- Women’s Roles
- Re-Baptism
- Professional Ministers
- Hermeneutics
Periodicals of 1870’s
- Gospel Advocate, David Lipscomb
- American Christian Review, Ben Franklin
- Christian Standard, Isaac Erret
The Angel of Mercy, Love, Peace and Truth
“I am for peace – my name is Peace – and no word of bitterness shall ever fall from my lips, even in self-defense.”
Larimore’s Reasons
- “I can understand how it is possible for them to act correctly and still not always do exactly as I do.”
- “I love my brethren, and long, long ago solemnly resolved never to go to war … against them.”
“I Belong to Christ”
“I have never belonged to a ?wing’ of the church or anything else. I belong to Christ, hence to the church of Christ – not to a ?wing’ of the church.”
Time to Choose Sides
“It is not best, in my humble judgment, to be silent when we see our fellow men, and especially our own family, drifting apart. Thousands of you friends believe you owe it to yourself , your family, your friends, your Saviour and your God to speak out on some matters now retarding the progress of the cause of Christ.”
– Oscar P. Spiegel
Larimore’s Reply
“I am sorry to disappoint any of my friends; but it is certainly clearly my duty to leave the discussion of all such questions to wiser, better, abler men and just simply “PREACH THE WORD,” avoiding, always, all questions that ?do gender strifes’ among the children of God.”
– T. B. Larimore
Preaching the Word
- Baptized an estimated 10,000 during career.
- Recognized by Churches of Christ and Disciples.
- Both sides of the Movement gave him tribute following his death in March, 1929.
The Silence of Larimore
“Larimore was in no sense a partisan, and he never spoke evil of any man, but he did have firm convictions.”
– G. C. Brewer (1946)
The Golden Rule
“I never call Christians or others “anti’s,” “digressives,” “mossbacks,” “tackies,” or “trash.” I concede to all, and accord to all, the same sincereity and courtesy I claim for myself, as the Golden Rule demands …”
– T. B. Larimore – (Gospel Advocate, 1917)
Peace and Unity
“Of the seven things Solomon declares to be an abomination unto God, the crown of the climax is ‘he that soweth discord among the brethren.'”
– T. B. Larimore
“Accept the Right, Reject the Left”
Larimore’s Legacy
“The fact is that if everyone had had T. B. Larimore’s attitude, the problems would never have been blown up into divisive issues in the first place.”
– Douglas Foster
Posted by Chris on under Sermons
Can I tell you what I did during my summer vacation? Our family went to Disney World and our favorite park was EPCOT. We rode Spaceship Earth at least four times. The line wasn’t very long, the boys thought it was fun, it wasn’t scary, and most of all it was air conditioned.
You begin the ride by boarding a “time machine” which takes you through the history of human communication. It begins with cave paintings and the communications of cave men so that they can be more efficient while hunting. Then the Egyptians invent writing. The Phoenicians and Greeks work on universal alphabets. Monasteries copy writings. The printing press makes books available. Technology develops to make communication more immediate and then of course we end with computers. On the way down, the riders get to use communication to write their future. This is what my kids liked. They got to make goofy faces that are put into a cartoon.
About the fourth time through I began to grasp what it was all about … This narrative about communication was itself a narrative. More than that, it was a meta-narrative. A meta-narrative is simply the one big story that makes sense of everything. As a narrative, it told stories in a creative way.
But if it was going to be a META-narrative (the one big story), then something was missing … here’s what I thought was missing …
John 1:1-14
The gospel and the communication of it in Jesus Christ is a critical moment in human existence. The word becoming flesh has implications for past, present, and future.
What I like about the Epcot ride is that it emphasizes the importance of communication. Communication is important – consider our words – communion, community, commune. These all are related to communication. Communication is critical to forming community.
Communication and words are important to God also. God is a communicating God. He speaks, he writes, he reveals. But finally he communicates in a most extraordinary way through Jesus Christ.
Greek lesson: The meaning of “logos” (“Word” in John 1) is a concept, an idea, a logic. It is a message that is communicated. Not limited to saying and speaking. When God wants to communicate the one big story that makes sense of past, present, and future, he doesn’t just speak, rather he sends …
The alphabet that God used to send the one big story of the gospel was flesh and blood.
The syntax that God used to construct the one big story of the gospel was bone and sinew.
The grammar that God used to tell the one big story of the gospel was the breath and spirit of Jesus Christ.
The one big story of the gospel was not limited to a voice, a note, or a signal. It was told in the flesh. The man was the message …
The message is preached and practiced.
The message is broadcast and embodied.
Implication:
- We ought to pay attention to communication and work at it.
- We ought to have some concern for maintaining community.
- But the One Big Implication is this: If God became the message, then we also must BE the message.
This is what our baptism was about. We are conformed to the likeness of Christ. May God send us from here as an embodiment of the one big message.
Posted by Chris on June 15, 2008 under Sermons
Posted by David on May 28, 2008 under Sermons
First, we want to put ourselves in the frame of mind Paul was in when he wrote our text today. To do that, play a game of "Let’s Pretend" with me. Pretend that you have a close friend you admire and respect. This person is a close friend because he cared about you. In his care for you when he first met you, he went "way out on a limb" to help you. He literally put himself in a situation that he could be hurt because he helped you.
Continue to pretend with me. After he leaves you, your close friend does get into trouble because he helped some people just like you. The trouble is so serious that he winds up in jail. In fact, you are convinced that one of the reasons he is in trouble is because he helped you.
And there is nothing you can do to help him. He is too far from you for you to be of personal encouragement to him. You would have no influence on the people who put him in jail if your were with him.
Then one day you get a letter from him. In the letter he is concerned about you. He is genuinely concerned that you are discouraged because of his problems. He wants you to know as fact it is okay that he is experiencing problems. He knew from the beginning he would have problems because he cared about and helped people like you. He saw his situation as a price he paid for helping people like you. He saw his opposition as a God-given task the Lord gave him to help others understand God’s intentions in Jesus.
His concern: you might be discouraged by his problems. The thing that encourages him most in his situation is knowing you are okay. He does not want his troubles to discourage you!
I ask you to listen to or read with me in Ephesians 3:1-13 and see if you can hear all of this in this passage of scripture.
For this reason I, Paul, the prisoner of Christ Jesus for the sake of you Gentiles-if indeed you have heard of the stewardship of God’s grace which was given to me for you; that by revelation there was made known to me the mystery, as I wrote before in brief. By referring to this, when you read you can understand my insight into the mystery of Christ, which in other generations was not made known to the sons of men, as it has now been revealed to His holy apostles and prophets in the Spirit; to be specific, that the Gentiles are fellow heirs and fellow members of the body, and fellow partakers of the promise in Christ Jesus through the gospel, of which I was made a minister, according to the gift of God’s grace which was given to me according to the working of His power. To me, the very least of all saints, this grace was given, to preach to the Gentiles the unfathomable riches of Christ, and to bring to light what is the administration of the mystery which for ages has been hidden in God who created all things; so that the manifold wisdom of God might now be made known through the church to the rulers and the authorities in the heavenly places. This was in accordance with the eternal purpose which He carried out in Christ Jesus our Lord, in whom we have boldness and confident access through faith in Him. Therefore I ask you not to lose heart at my tribulations on your behalf, for they are your glory (Ephesians 3:1-13).
- Paul the Christian personally cared deeply about the people he taught.
- When he understood that Jesus was resurrected, was the Christ (the Jewish Messiah), he was amazed that God was so patient with him to the point of forgiving him and letting him participate in God’s mission.
- Listen carefully to what Paul the Christian said about himself and Jesus’ response to him in 1 Timothy 1:12-16:
I thank Christ Jesus our Lord, who has strengthened me, because He considered me faithful, putting me into service, even though I was formerly a blasphemer and a persecutor and a violent aggressor. Yet I was shown mercy because I acted ignorantly in unbelief; and the grace of our Lord was more than abundant, with the faith and love which are found in Christ Jesus. It is a trustworthy statement, deserving full acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, among whom I am foremost of all. Yet for this reason I found mercy, so that in me as the foremost, Jesus Christ might demonstrate His perfect patience as an example for those who would believe in Him for eternal life.
- In what way was Paul the sinner ignorantly acting in unbelief? He completely misunderstood Jesus! He did not know who Jesus was!
- Listen to what he said about himself before he became a Christian in Acts 26:9-12:
So then, I thought to myself that I had to do many things hostile to the name of Jesus of Nazareth. And this is just what I did in Jerusalem; not only did I lock up many of the saints in prisons, having received authority from the chief priests, but also when they were being put to death I cast my vote against them. And as I punished them often in all the synagogues, I tried to force them to blaspheme; and being furiously enraged at them, I kept pursuing them even to foreign cities. While so engaged as I was journeying to Damascus with the authority and commission of the chief priests . . .
- The transformation in Paul from violent opponent of Jesus to encourager of those who sought Jesus is astounding!
- In the scriptures we just read, we see how violently Paul opposed Jesus and those who believed Jesus was the Christ when Paul did not understand who Jesus was and regarded the reports of Jesus’ resurrection as lies.
- Listen to the contrast Paul made from the violent man who did not know Jesus was the Christ to the encouraging man who understood the work of God in Jesus. This statement is made to the Christians at Thessalonica concerning Paul’s behavior when he was with them. It is recorded in 1 Thessalonians 2:5-12.
For we never came with flattering speech, as you know, nor with a pretext for greed-God is witness-nor did we seek glory from men, either from you or from others, even though as apostles of Christ we might have asserted our authority. But we proved to be gentle among you, as a nursing mother tenderly cares for her own children. Having so fond an affection for you, we were well-pleased to impart to you not only the gospel of God but also our own lives, because you had become very dear to us. For you recall, brethren, our labor and hardship, how working night and day so as not to be a burden to any of you, we proclaimed to you the gospel of God. You are witnesses, and so is God, how devoutly and uprightly and blamelessly we behaved toward you believers; just as you know how we were exhorting and encouraging and imploring each one of you as a father would his own children, so that you would walk in a manner worthy of the God who calls you into His own kingdom and glory.
- The change occurred in Paul because he finally understood God was at work in Jesus.
- The same kind of transformation will occur in you when you understand that God is at work in Jesus.
- You will continue to change, to grow closer to God’s character all your life, as you deepen your understanding of God’s work in Jesus.
- For the reason of spiritual growth and development, Paul never left new Christians alone to struggle to understand their new life in Jesus Christ.
- Do you remember the charge the resurrected Jesus gave to the apostles in Matthew 28:18-20?
And Jesus came up and spoke to them, saying, “All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.”
- I ask you to note four things.
- The first thing: God through Jesus’ resurrection gave him all spiritual authority, so the resurrected Jesus had the right to give the apostles this charge.
- The second thing: The charge Jesus gave the apostles was a worldwide charge meant for all people, not for a single nation nor a group of nations.
- The third thing: the core of the charge was to go worldwide and make disciples.
- Disciples are the followers of a teacher.
- They were to understand that Jesus was the teacherl; they were to follow him.
- The fourth thing: Their message about Jesus would produce two results.
- The people who wanted to follow Jesus would be baptized (baptism then meant immersion).
- The people who wanted to follow Jesus would observe Jesus’ teachings, his instructions on how to live, his commandments.
- These people would not prove they belonged to Jesus just by being baptized, but they would change the way they lived by following Jesus’ teachings.
- Today, it is essential to teach people to be Jesus’ disciples, to teach people to allow Jesus’ teachings and values to determine how they live.
- Paul cared greatly about the people he converted to Jesus Christ, and he did not leave them to struggle on their own to discover how to be disciples.
- Sometimes persecution or other obstacles prevented Paul personally from remaining and being of assistance to people newly converted to Christ.
- When that occurred, when Paul attracted so much opposition he was forced to leave, he would either leave part of his team to teach the converts, or he would send someone to check on them.
- Often, that person was Timothy.
- Listen to Acts 17:15, 16–
Now those who escorted Paul brought him as far as Athens; and receiving a command for Silas and Timothy to come to him as soon as possible, they left. Now while Paul was waiting for them at Athens, his spirit was being provoked within him as he was observing the city full of idols.
- Paul was by himself in Athens.
- He was by himself because people who strongly opposed Jesus Christ came to Berea because Paul was teaching there.
- The new converts perceived Paul’s life was in jeopardy, so they escorted him–for his own safety–to Athens.
- But Silas and Timothy stayed in Berea.
- Listen to 1 Corinthians 4:17–
For this reason I have sent to you Timothy, who is my beloved and faithful child in the Lord, and he will remind you of my ways which are in Christ, just as I teach everywhere in every church.
- Listen again to Philippians 2:19, 20–
But I hope in the Lord Jesus to send Timothy to you shortly, so that I also may be encouraged when I learn of your condition. For I have no one else of kindred spirit who will genuinely be concerned for your welfare.
- Listen still again to statements Paul made in 1 Thessalonians 3 —
Verses 1-3: Therefore when we could endure it no longer, we thought it best to be left behind at Athens alone, and we sent Timothy, our brother and God’s fellow worker in the gospel of Christ, to strengthen and encourage you as to your faith, so that no one would be disturbed by these afflictions; for you yourselves know that we have been destined for this.
Verses 6-8: But now that Timothy has come to us from you, and has brought us good news of your faith and love, and that you always think kindly of us, longing to see us just as we also long to see you, for this reason, brethren, in all our distress and affliction we were comforted about you through your faith; for now we really live, if you stand firm in the Lord.
- To this same person, Paul wrote these instructions and encouragement in 2 Timothy 2:24-26:
The Lord’s bond-servant must not be quarrelsome, but be kind to all, able to teach, patient when wronged, with gentleness correcting those who are in opposition, if perhaps God may grant them repentance leading to the knowledge of the truth, and they may come to their senses and escape from the snare of the devil, having been held captive by him to do his will.
- It is not enough for a person to be baptized into Jesus Christ.
- As important as that is, Jesus said it is not enough.
- The baptized person must dedicate himself or herself to living as Jesus’ disciple by learning his values and teachings.
- I want to end by directing your attention to today’s text we read at the beginning of this lesson, Ephesians 3:1-13.
- First, I want to note how deeply Paul cared about these people.
- Paul was Jewish by birth, and the people to whom he wrote were not Jewish by birth.
- In Paul’s lifetime, and long before, that mattered a lot.
- It mattered so much that typically devout Jews had only necessary interaction with non-Jews (gentiles).
- Devout Jews worshipped the living God; gentiles generally worshipped idols or believed in nothing.
- The lifestyle of Jews and the lifestyle of idol worshippers were quite different.
- Paul, who had been very Jewish (Galatians 1:13, 14), understood through God’s revelation that God wanted to save gentiles as much as He wanted to save Jews.
- That was not a popular understanding to have!
- People never like their religious beliefs to change, and Paul’s understanding would result in a huge change.
- Paul’s understanding was not accepted by many Jews, and it was not accepted by many idol worshippers.
- Paul said he knew his understanding by God’s revelation meant trouble for him.
- However, that trouble was okay.
- He looked upon his understanding as a stewardship from God–God was in charge of the understanding; Paul was only responsible for handling this understanding responsibly.
- Paul labeled his understanding "the mystery of Christ."
- He said this mystery had not been previously understood by people.
- He said this mystery of Christ meant through the gospel (of God working through Jesus Christ), God could make Christians of gentiles as certainly as He could make Christians of Jews.
- Paul’s responsibility was to tell everyone of God’s grace expressed in the resurrected Jesus.
- Paul wanted everyone to understand what God did in the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
- Paul wanted everyone to see how wise God was.
- He wanted everyone to see this was God’s eternal purpose, not some afterthought of God, not some crazy idea of Paul’s.
- Paul’s responsibility was to handle this understanding boldly and confidently.
- Therefore, Paul did not want them to be discouraged because he was being opposed and physically suffering.
- He did not deny what he endured was the result of teaching them.
- However, he wanted them to understand that their continuing in Jesus Christ glorified what God did in Jesus.
The issue is not "is Jesus Christ opposed." That has always been true. The issue is "are you willing to be a disciple of Jesus Christ?" Do you understand what God did in Jesus’ death and resurrection? Are you willing to let Jesus teach you how to live?
Posted by David on May 27, 2008 under Sermons
I hope you have had at least one of those moments when you "see" something you never saw before. What you "see" is not new. It has always been there for you to "see." Yet, for some reason (or a number of reasons), you never noticed it before. Once you "see" it, it is so obvious that you are forced to evaluate yourself. "Why didn’t I see that a long time ago? It is not new! It has always been there! How could I have not noticed it until now?"
Much of the time this "seeing" has to do with learning. Maybe a person’s focus was so given to something else that the "something else" is all he or she saw–he or she was so focused on one thing that he or she failed to see anything else.
Often this "seeing" is inconvenient. Once he or she "sees" the obvious, he or she can no longer ignore it. This "new to me" information demands that the person must do some additional evaluation of a matter that was already "settled" in the person’s thinking or view. Reevaluation is downright inconvenient!
Use today’s text as an illustration.
Before Jesus’ ministry, the Jewish people had God, God’s purposes, God’s objectives, and God’s ways figured out and settled for generations. There was not anything to learn. They just needed to evaluate all that happened by what they knew from past generations. They basically knew what kind of Messiah (Christ) God would send. They knew the basic nature of the kingdom God would establish. They knew the kind of rule God would institute. They knew they were God’s people, and God cared about them more than God cared about other people. The key to doing God’s will was convincing all other people to become a part of them as a proselyte. If everyone became just like them, everything would be okay.
Then Jesus began his ministry among the Jewish people. He was not what they expected as a Messiah. He spoke of a kingdom that was downright strange to them. He spoke of God’s rule in ways they found weird. He indicated that God was interested in people who were not "rules-keeping Jews." He indicated they were not God’s objective, but a God-intended vehicle to God’s objective.
Thus many, especially the prominent ones, did what they were supposed to do. They evaluated Jesus. In their opinion Jesus just did not measure up to their expectations. So many of them rejected Jesus.
Thus began one of the major problems in the first-century congregations. Jewish Christians has a hard time understanding how gentile Christians could be saved without circumcision, following the law God revealed through Moses, and adopting Jewish ways of doing things. The most written about conflict (in scripture) among Christians in first-century congregations was this: how can Jewish Christians and gentile Christians possibly be one in Jesus Christ?
Listen carefully to our reading (or read with me) and see if you hear that problem in Ephesians 2:11-22: Therefore remember that formerly you, the Gentiles in the flesh, who are called “Uncircumcision” by the so-called “Circumcision,” which is performed in the flesh by human hands-remember that you were at that time separate from Christ, excluded from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers to the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world. But now in Christ Jesus you who formerly were far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ. For He Himself is our peace, who made both groups into one and broke down the barrier of the dividing wall, by abolishing in His flesh the enmity, which is the Law of commandments contained in ordinances, so that in Himself He might make the two into one new man, thus establishing peace, and might reconcile them both in one body to God through the cross, by it having put to death the enmity. And He came and preached peace to you who were far away, and peace to those who were near; for through Him we both have our access in one Spirit to the Father. So then you are no longer strangers and aliens, but you are fellow citizens with the saints, and are of God’s household, having been built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus Himself being the corner stone, in whom the whole building, being fitted together, is growing into a holy temple in the Lord, in whom you also are being built together into a dwelling of God in the Spirit.
- There are several things in this reading you should note.
- First, gentile Christians (which most of us are now) were in a really difficult situation spiritually before they became Christians.
- They were not a part of the Jewish nation.
- God had no covenant (agreement) with them.
- God made no direct promises to them.
- They had nothing to serve as a basis of hope in God.
- They were strictly on their own, and that was a horrible situation to be in.
- Second, the situation radically changed when God sent Jesus to become the Christ through the sacrifice of his blood.
- Through Christ, God brought even the gentiles near to Himself.
- Through Christ, gentiles had as much right to come to God as did Jewish people.
- Through Christ, God made (please take note of the past tense) Jews who would accept Jesus Christ and gentiles who would accept Jesus Christ one.
- Through Christ, God made a peace between both groups.
- Through Christ, God destroyed any advantage Jewish people had through their past relationship with God.
- Through Christ, God made both Jews in Christ and gentiles in Christ one body of Christ’s.
- Through Christ, God reconciled both groups.
- The key for both Jewish Christians and gentile Christians was the same key–Jesus Christ.
- Understanding what God did through Jesus Christ allows Jewish Christians to be at peace in God and allows gentile Christians (no matter who they were or what their background was) to be at peace in God.
- Jesus Christ was the access to God for both groups.
- What does all that mean?
- It means any non-Jew who lived in idolatry in the past was a stranger and alien to God.
- However, with what God did in Jesus Christ, gentiles in Christ can be citizens in God’s kingdom and a part of God’s family.
- It meant that gentile Christians had the Jewish apostles and Jewish prophets as their faith foundation and Jesus Christ as their faith cornerstone in the same way Jewish Christians did.
- It meant God no longer lived in temples constructed by people.
- Not the Jewish temple in Jerusalem.
- Not idolatrous temples.
- Why? Because God now lived in the people who belonged to Him.
- People who belonged to Him–whether Jewish Christians or gentile Christians–were formed by God into His new temple.
- God’s new temple is formed out of people who belong to Him, not out of stones and construction materials.
- In the new kingdom, God lives in people instead of in places.
- God’s people–wherever they are and whatever they are doing–are to be God’s temple, God’s presence (see 1 Peter 1:5-10 as Peter used the same concept).
- There are several indicators that suggest there could be radical transitions in the way "we do church" in the future.
- There already has been far more transition than most of us realize.
- At the end of World War II, the Church of Christ was basically a rural church.
- The majority of its members were poor people living on family farms.
- The church building was usually located on some land someone gave from his farm for the purpose of having a building.
- There was no air conditioning, primitive heating (by today’s standards), graveled parking lots that were small, and few adult class rooms.
- There was no printed material to study, few people with college degrees, few full time preachers, no libraries, no education wings, few classrooms for children, few education programs, and no plans to improve or add to those things.
- A preacher who had been to college was looked upon with suspicion.
- There were all kinds of divisions that had happened, were happening, or would soon happen.
- Should you do anything another church was doing?
- What was your conviction on the millenium?
- What translation of the Bible could a person use?
- Was it scriptural to serve communion at the beginning of service?
- Should congregations cooperate in any enterprise or endeavor?
- Should you use only one cup in communion?
- Was how long you preached and how many scriptures you used a matter of faithfulness?
- Could women wear pants?
- Could women come to church without a hat?
- Could women cut their hair?
- Could men grow beards? Get tattoos? Wear "long hair?"
- Could you buy groceries from a store that sold beer or eat in a restaurant that served alcoholic beverages?
- These were just some of the questions vigorously debated–we always have been a people who sharply defended our positions.
- Today we are mostly an urban church with rural roots–family farms have disappeared, and we continue to struggle as we address urban needs and realities.
- Today most of us prefer well trained preachers, we want better facilities, we want education programs, we want libraries, we have to have paved parking lots, and we plan creature comforts to be a part of any expansion we do.
- Things will change in the future.
- For the past 30 years we have been able to economically afford expansions, programs, and buildings–what happens when we cannot afford such things? How will that change what we do and how we do it?
- (This is not at all the suggestion that we "hoard" what we have in a useless attempt to address the uncertainties of the future!)
- For years we converted people with at least an understanding of Christian basics.
- Not so now or in the future!
- An increasing number of converts will come from either no spiritual background or a background in a non-Christian religion.
- Increasingly, our congregations will be composed of people with needs and challenges that we have not dealt with in the past.
- Increasingly, members will struggle with views that are new to us who have been a part of congregations for three generations.
- Politically, people who were viewed as Christians occupied a position of "favored status" in the past.
- That is changing fast!
- How will we react when we deal with opposition instead of encouragement?
As increased needs and challenges become our new reality, passages such as the one we focused on today will become more relevant to us. We will increasingly understand that unity is a gift God gave us in the death of Jesus which we seek to preserve, not a status we seek to achieve through human accomplishment. Just as God in Christ made gentile Christians and Jewish Christians one, God can and will make us one. Not because we all conform–we never will!! Not because we all agree on one lifestyle–we never will! It will exist because of what God did for us in Jesus’ blood.
First-century Christians needed to understand that when Paul wrote. Christians still need to understand that.
Posted by Chris on May 25, 2008 under Sermons
Please ask Chris Benjamin for permission before reproducing
any of the images, graphics, or charts on this page. |
Strengths and Weaknesses
- A people of the Book.
- More concerned about what the Bible said than those around us.
- Not pursuing the American dream but seeking the kingdom.
- Evangelistic and growing numerically.
- Cared for the poor and hungry.
- Race relations – still too much a part of Southern culture.
- The reputation that: “They think they’re the only ones going to heaven.”
- Many disputed more, prayed less, and forced conformity to a narrow view of doctrinal correctness.
The Impact of World War 2
- Post-WW2 decades push church into the mainstream
- Three factors:
– Education
– World Missions
– Middle-class acculturation
Missions
- In 1946 the Broadway church called a national meeting to discuss missions cooperation.
- The “Sponsoring Congregation” Plan
– Broadway in Lubbock, Texas, for Germany
– Union Avenue in Memphis, Tennessee, for Japan
– Crescent Hill in Brownfield, Texas, for Italy
Women in Missions
- Sarah Andrews, Japan, 1916 – 1961
- Hettie Lee Ewing, Japan, 1926
- Elizabeth Bernard, China, Hong Kong, 1933-1971
- Irene Johnson-Gatewood, Germany, post-WW2
Education
- Impact of G.I. Bill
– Abilene Christian College, Harding College, David Lipscomb College, Freed-Hardeman College, and Pepperdine College attendance increased.
- Between 1942-1964 eleven new Christian colleges are formed in the U.S.
- Funding came from churches, members, and business leaders.
If You Build it …
- Attractive buildings are tools for evangelism
- Special programs for all members of the family
– Responded to “Baby Boom”
- New ministries
– Multi-staff
– Education, youth, campus
Madison Church of Christ
- “You Can March for the Master,” Ira North, 1959
- Madison’s explosive growth made it the model for church growth techniques in many congregations in the U.S.
- North emphasized one-to-one evangelism
Jule Miller Filmstrips
- A recorded narrative with pictures
- Provided ordinary church members with an attractively-packaged “plan of salvation”
Christian Broadcasting
- Herald of Truth began national broadcasting on radio in 1952. Television in 1954.
- Batsell Barrett Baxter joined in 1959 as the speaker.
- Rise of new journalism
– 20th Century Christian
– Power for Today
– Christian Chronicle (1943)
In the Mainstream
- Periodicals, broadcasts, lectureships and workshops created a mainstream identity.
- National recognition and influenced accepted
– Celebrities (such as Pat Boone)
– 1964-1965 New York World’s Fair Exhibit
Innovation and Change
- Growth meant innovative methods
- Financial cooperation to support
– missions
– colleges
– media evangelism
– para-church institutions (children’s homes, etc.)
- Suspicion: new methods are based on a desire for worldly prestige or attempt to control.
- Individuals might support innovations but not churches.
The Gospel Guardian
- Fanning Yater Tant, editor of The Gospel Guardian:
- Opposed “sponsoring congregations”
- Used the argument from silence
- Threatened autonomy and non-denominational Christianity
Advocate vs. Guardian
- The debate rhetoric was so strong on both sides that a split took place.
- In 1954, B.C. Goodpasture, editor of the Gospel Advocate, called for a “quarantine” of the “anti-cooperation” faction.
- 2,000 congregations (120,000 members) maintained the non-institutional position.
The Winds of Change
- The Church was no longer culturally alienated – it was now “mainstream.”
– Members were generally more educated and affluent.
- Innovation generated amazing growth and opposition
– A tension for the Restoration movement
– Innovations of an earlier age forgotten
– Innovation to come questioned
- Ambiguous relationship with politics
– Opposed Catholic President (1960)
– Uninvolved in Civil Rights (1964)
- Theology remained rational and issue-oriented (for both groups in split)
– The ancient order of things
– Three-part hermeneutic
– Argument from silence
What do we do when the mainstream goes the wrong way?
Posted by Chris on under Sermons
I cannot recall when so many preachers were involved in a political campaign. This week John McCain rejected the endorsement of two televangelists. A few weeks ago, Barack Obama denounced the words of his former preacher. Let’s not forget that Mike Huckabee, who may still be involved in this race in some way, was a once a preacher in Arkansas. Hilary Clinton hasn’t had any problems with preachers – not yet.
So with all of these others getting involved, I wanted to speak my piece and make my endorsements …
This first thing I would say though, is that if I were to endorse a particular candidate I don’t think it would do much good. You shouldn’t vote my way for that reason alone. Every citizen has to make an informed decision and there’s no point in all of us collectively checking out on our responsibility. I would rather endorse certain principles and let you decide …
As we reflect on what it means to be Christians in America, let’s reflect on God’s Politics. The prime political statement in Scripture is this: God is the Highest Authority. There are many ways that this is expressed. God is sovereign, God rules, God is Lord of Lords and King of Kings.
The word of the Old Testament is clear. Kings, monarchs, nations will come and go, but God’s rule is eternal.
- Nebuchadnezzar learned this. God humbled the leader of that world super-power (Babylon) and Nebuchadnezzar left a letter to share with anyone what he learned. This letter calls on all authorities to acknowledge God’s superior authority (Daniel 4:34).
The word of the New Testament is clear: Jesus Christ was crucified, buried, and raised by God’s power and authority. God has exalted him. He is Lord of Lords and King of Kings (Revelation 19 and Philippians 2).
So I endorse this primary principle: God rules. He is in charge and that does not change regardless of who is in the White House, the Congress or the Supreme Court.
Now accepting this principle we ask, so what should Christians do then if God rules? We ought to pray …
- The prophet Jeremiah urged the exiles in Babylon to pray for the welfare of their captors. These people were being called upon to pray for a nation that wasn’t their home, a nation that did not share their values. But Jeremiah informs them that God wants them to seek to do good and build up that nation. If God’s people could pray for Babylon, then we can pray for our nation. We must pray for our nation (Jeremiah 29).
- 2 Chronicles 7:14 – Prayer is a humility that bows to God’s authority.
- 1 Timothy 2:1-4 – Praying for the leaders of our nation is a work of evangelism.
So I endorse prayer. Let us treat prayer as not only a privilege and responsibility but also as a mission.
If God is the supreme authority then let’s remember what issues matter to our Lord. What does the Lord require of us?
- Micah 6:8 – What does the Lord require of you? His agenda is clear — to do justice love kindness and walk humbly with God.
- Matthew 23:23 – There are weightier matters such as justice, mercy, and faith
- Acts 24:25 – Paul preaches to a politician of his time about justice, self-control, and the coming judgment
We can practice justice, mercy, kindness, and humility regardless of what party is in the majority. These virtues should be non-partisan. They ought to be basic.
My son was given an assignment to describe what he would do if he was president. He said …
I would give the people in storms good homes. Also I would raise money to save the poor. Give the U.S. Military a monthly break. Fill bills that needed to be filled. And I would have a speech that all drugs are illegal. Then I would have a party about my new rule.
All I can say to that is “I’m his father and I approve this message.”
Maybe we complicate politics too much. Maybe we should pay attention to the politics of a 9-year-old. Maybe we should see that Scripture’s politics and God’s politics really aren’t that different from such simple politics. Maybe it would clarify things for us and we wouldn’t be so anxious. Instead we would focus on doing justice, loving kindness, and walking humbly with God. Those are God’s Politics and I endorse them.
We don’t have to have a certain party in power or a certain person in the presidency to follow those politics. Maybe some of us need to run for office, but whether we hold office or not we know who the supreme political power truly is and we can be a part of his party.
I offer this endorsement as an encouragement from God’s Word. I endorse doing what God requires. No matter who wins the various offices up for election, let us endorse the following …
– God rules above all
– We need to pray
– Let’s do justice, love kindness, and walk humbly with God.
Posted by Chris on May 18, 2008 under Sermons
Please ask Chris Benjamin for permission before reproducing
any of the images, graphics, or charts on this page. |
“Accept Him Who is Weak”
- David Lipscomb (1875):
- “So long as a man really desires to do right, to serve the Lord, to obey his commands, we cannot withdraw from him.”
Declaration and Address
- Thomas Campbell (1809):
- Where the Bible is unclear or silent, no disagreement should divide Christians.
- When Campbell spoke of “being silent where the Bible is silent,” he allowed for strong opinions on what that silence meant.
1832 Union
- Raccoon John Smith:
- Silent on the precise positions that Christians might take that are not part of the gospel.
- Speak where Bible speaks = simply use the words of Scripture.
All Silence is Not Equal
- Silence permitted the Missionary Society
- Silence forbade instrumental music in worship
Three-Part Hermeneutic
- Focus is on what practices the Bible authorizes:
- Direct Command,
- Approved Example, and
- Necessary Inference
Other Considerations
- Does this practice reflect the nature of God?
- Is it in line with the biblical story of redemption?
- Does it build up the church?
- Does it promote Christian virtue?
- Is it a “weightier matter”?
Speaking Where the Bible Speaks
- Black Churches of Christ
- “I have had to rely upon God, he is the only one I had. The white man didn’t like me because of the color of my skin. The colored man didn’t like me because of my religion. Now, son, who else did I have?” — Marshall Keeble
Posted by Chris on May 11, 2008 under Sermons
Please ask Chris Benjamin for permission before reproducing
any of the images, graphics, or charts on this page. |
Growth 1906-1946
- 1906 – 159,658
- 1916 – 317,937
- 1926 – 435,714
- 1936 – 309,551
- 1946 – 682,172
Aftermath of 1906
- Debate
– Controversy was the only way to reach consensus without creeds or conventions
- Dissension
– Congregational division over various issues was common before 1930’s
- Disempowerment
– Afraid to do anything for fear of doing something wrong
Trivia or Truth?
- Baptistery or Running River?
- A plate for the bread or not?
- Extend an invitation or wait for the question?
- Elders or no elders?
- Any song or just those addresses to the Lord?
The Sunday School Issue
- Opposition to Sunday Schools
– Unauthorized [silence of Scripture]
– Biblical pattern instructed parents to teach children
- 1925 – Directory of Non-Class churches assembled
- The Apostolic Way listed the faithful preachers and churches.
The Cup Question
- In the 1920’s multiple containers for the communion became common
- At issue was the pattern of the Lord’s Supper prescribed in Scripture
– Multiple cups were unauthorized
– The one cup was an element of the communion pattern
- The faithful were listed in the Old Paths Advocate.
Millennial Controversy
- R. H. Boll – 1915 Gospel Advocate articles
- Believed the prophetic sections of Scripture should be examined
- Was told to quit writing. He then started a new journal, Word and Work.
- H. Leo Boles, Pres. Nashville Bible School
- 1927 Boll-Boles debate in Gospel Advocate (May-November)
- After debate Boles invited Boll to speak at NBS Chapel service
- 1933 Neal-Wallace debate; Wallace suggested the issue threatened fellowship.
- Wallace not only condemned Boll, but also those he considered sympathetic with Boll.
- Criticism of Wallace’s crusade
- J. N. Armstrong:
– Premillennialism was a personal conviction
– Minority view should be treated graciously
Dynamics of Division
- Focus on observable practice.
- List of “the faithful”
- No fellowship with error
- Methodology more important that theology
- One side opposes divergence from the pattern, the other is indifferent.
“Accept the Right, Reject the Left”
