Posted by John on January 1, 2001 under Articles
A statement is proven by the presence of evidence and not the absence of evidence. In the popular CSI program the accurate catch phrase is “follow the evidence.” That is, something positive must be there that points one in a specific direction over other possibilities. This is called the “weight of evidence.” You can’t make a case for something without evidence for it!
As often is the case, some pieces of the puzzle are missing. Some details are not there. But this does not mean that one conclusion is just as good as another. Usually the bulk of facts point to one view over others as being the truth of the matter. For example, if one were to just go with the positive evidence given in the New Testament about the act of baptism, total immersion in a body of water would be the conclusion supported by that evidence. While every case of baptism is not listed and some details of the baptisms that are listed are not given, there are enough facts given to say that we are “being led by the Spirit” to see that total immersion in water was the original design.
It simply won’t do make a case without giving positive evidence to support it. Those who want to pour or sprinkle for baptism simply say that there is no evidence against these modes and there is an absence of any mandate to stay with the original design. These are not arguments from evidence but from the absence of evidence. The “it doesn’t say not to” idea proves nothing. (This could be applied to other “issues” as well.)
Because Churches of Christ believe that God has given us the New Testament to learn of the beliefs and practices of the church under Apostolic oversight, we go to it to give documentary evidence for what we teach and do. This is “following the evidence.” This is sound.
Posted by John on January 1, 2000 under Articles
Here are just the facts on the topic of the use of instrumental music in Old Testament and Christian worship. It will be seen that just the facts alone make a compelling case for the non-use of instrumental music in Christian worship.
The primary and derived facts are listed (hopefully) without commentary.
Fact #1 — In the Old Testament, God asked for singing + instrumental music for use in worship (2 Chronicles 29:25-26; Psalm 150). It was something they could be sure about.
Fact #2 — In the New Testament, God just asks for singing (Ephesians 5:19) or the “fruit of lips” (Hebrews 13:15). Hence, singing was something that the worshiper could absolutely be sure about.
But because there is no clear directive from God on the use of instrumental music (as contrasted with the Old Testament), it is something that one can not absolutely be sure about.
Fact #3 — After the church came into being and for at least 400 or so years, God was given just what he asked for (singing). As a result, the word “a cappella” came into being and was the term for “music in the church style.” The use of this term is the musical history of Christian worship in a nut-shell. (“A Cappella Singing,” by Dr. William M. Green, Professor of classical languages, University of California, Berkeley; Encyclopedia of Early Christianity, by E. Ferguson, p629ff)
Fact #4 — Before the New Testament was completed, the church used the Old Testament scriptures as their primary source (Acts 17:11; 18:28, etc.). They had the very scriptures before them that approved and encouraged the use of instruments right down to the naming of specific types (2 Chronicles 29:25-26; Psalm 150). And at the time of the early church, instruments were available and many Christians had the talent to play them … yet this talent was not exercised in worship! The Old Testament scripture was not followed.
Fact #5 — That instrumental music was absent from Christian worship during the days of the inspired Apostolic teaching (John 14:26; Acts 2: 42) proves that the Apostles, who were very familiar with the use of instruments in Temple worship, never encouraged churches to use them.
The above also means that the Holy Spirit never encouraged churches to use instruments (John 14:26) in spite of the fact that it once did so in a direct way (2 Chronicles 29:25ff).
Fact #6 — Ephesians 5:19 has two parts: Singing + Making Melody. The “making melody” is translated from the Greek word “psallo.” It means to “pluck or twang.” The adverbial phrase that follows tells where this action takes place. It is “in the heart” and not on a harp. This fixes the locus of the “plucking” in a figurative sense. Note the contrast with the physical, Old Testament worship (McClintock and Strong’s Encyclopedia , Vol. VIII, p739; Thayer’s Greek Lexicon on “psallo”; personal discussion with Dr. Adrian Herren).
Fact #7 — The design of the New Covenant worship will be different than that of the Old Covenant (Jeremiah 31:31; John 4:23; Hebrews 7:12; 10:1,10; 9:1). Many physical things of the Old pointed to their true substance in the New. For example, in the Old it was the priests that offered physical sacrifices to God, but in the New everyone is a priest with spiritual sacrifices to offer (1 Peter 2:5). It is specifically the “fruit of lips” that is the sacrifice of praise asked for (Hebrews 13:15) and not the sounds from man-made devices. (See Things Old and New in Religion, by Hoyt Bailey, for more examples.)
CONCLUSIONS FROM THE FACTS
Before doing a thing, it is proper to ask “Can we be sure that this is approved by God?”
- The facts show that we cannot be sure that God approves the use of instrumental music in worship. This makes it a “questionable” and “unsure” matter.
- However, the facts show that we can be absolutely sure that just singing has God’s approval. All can agree upon this.
- The total context argues strongly that the non-use of the instrument is a matter of design (i.e., it was no accident that it was left out).
APPLICATION
Since God has had something to say in both Covenants about music in worship …
- Unity, peace, and assurance are by-products when we practice just what God has asked for (singing).
- Division, debate, and torn conscience are the by-products of introducing things into worship that are “questionable” and “uncertain” (e.g., instrumental music).
Therefore, common sense tells us that the use of instrumental music in worship is inadvisable in the least.
An Example: The Restoration Movement was a unity effort. The plea was to limit teaching and practices to just what all could agree was a God-given directive and be silent about (not teach or practice) those things that were without direct evidence. For example, individuals may have an opinion that instrumental music would be accepted by God, but for the sake of unity would limit their practice to just doing what God clearly asked for–singing. And this worked until some began to push their opinion and division resulted. Usually most churches in the southern United States going by the name “Church of Christ” are still a cappella in practice while “Christian Churches” use the instrument.
The above has not sought to pronounce any judgement upon those who use instrumental music, but instead to see if the total evidence for its use in Christian worship is positive or negative. It will be left to one’s own conscience as to what to do in the face of the evidence.
It is well to remember that when God specifies a path to follow, we should follow it with full faith in the superiority of God (Isaiah 55:8) … for it is not in man to direct his own steps (Jeremiah 10:23).
Posted by Earl on October 1, 1998 under Articles
If asked what our national priorities should be, many answers would come forth even from Christians. Some would say the top priority is to impeach the President for his misconduct and alleged lying before the Grand Jury. Others might say that we should give full attention and priority to correcting the economic crisis that is spreading throughout the world.
On a congregational level, we might say our priority should be to get the Family Life Center completed as soon as possible. Others might say we need to get more people involved in ministry. Others might see a priority for doing more mission work, expanding our benevolent programs, etc. All of these things are needed and good within themselves. However, there are higher priorities than any of the above, whether they involve national morality or local congregational needs and issues.
In Colossians 3, Paul sets forth priorities for the Christian that will not only enhance the quality of life on earth, but, above all, will give us a proper perspective for eternity with God. May we all be encouraged to make these our highest priorities: (1) set your heart and mind on things above and not on earthly things; (2) put to death whatever belongs to your earthly nature: sexual immorality, impurity, lust, evil desires, and greed; (3) get rid of any anger, rage, malice, slander, and filthy language that might still be a part of you; (4) make sure you do not lie to each other.
Once we have set our heart and mind on things above and have put off those things which belonged to our earthly nature, then we can make it our priority to: (1) clothe ourselves with compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness, and patience; (2) bear with and forgive each other whatever grievances we may have against one another; Forgive as the Lord forgave us! (3) finally, we can put on the greatest of all these virtues — LOVE — which will bind them all together in perfect unity.
As a Christian, I should be concerned with the problems and ills of society. I should be concerned with the growth and work of the local congregation. But my top priority is to clothe myself with Christ, to put on the new man, and then I can be salt and light to a lost world as Jesus commanded. May God help us all to have our priorities in the right place!
Posted by Meg on July 1, 1998 under Articles
In 1982, Laotian refugees settled in my hometown of Fort Smith, Arkansas, after the war in Southeast Asia. Through the efforts of Tom and Lou Porter, a Laotian congregation was formed at what was then called the Windsor Drive Church of Christ.
Members of the congregation were challenged to adopt a Laotian family. Because our family had an interest in missions and this was a great opportunity for outreach, we met and immediately fell in love with a Laotian mother, Dy, and her daughter, Knott.
During the next 12 years, my husband, Jerry, and I spent a few weeks each year in Nigeria, Indonesia and the South Pacific. Being separated from Jerry when he sometimes went without me was difficult. So in 1996, when Jerry came home from a two-week trip to Laos and announced, “It is time for us to go to help in Laos,” I replied, “Let’s go.”
We attended an intensive Laotian language course at Arizona State University and sold part of our farm and cattle. We also investigated water-well drilling and latrine construction as aid projects for the Laotian people to prepare for our mission.
For the first year we would spend eight months in Laos and the second year only four months. That did not seem too sacrificial; I could handle it.
Only six or seven Christians met in Laos on Sundays in l995. Encouraged by Ken and Jean Fox, the church grew. Many were interested in learning about Jesus Christ. Visitors came to services weekly. During 1997, the church was meeting four nights a week at various home locations, and growth was evident. By fall, approximately 65 people were meeting during the Sunday worship service.
Except for a few minor adjustments, our first year, 1997, went smoothly. Adjusting to the slow pace of the Laotian bureaucracy took time, but we used the free time to teach English and the Bible while we developed loving relationships and worshiped with a small group of Laotian Christians in the capitol city of Vientiane.
After spending the holidays in the States, we were off again to Laos. Near the end of January, the Laotian Christians held a week-long Bible study. We had visitors from outside of town and from within Vientiane. We were especially joyful about the seven precious souls who obeyed the gospel that week. The studies would conclude on Friday evening.
The Laotian Christians studied from 7 a.m. until 8:30 p.m. Jerry and I arrived at 7 p.m. for the last lesson of a study about Revelation.
As we sat and read, we suddenly heard footsteps marching up the walkway and then into the assembly. I thought, Is this real or is it a prank? The men all wore uniforms displaying the words “immigration” or “municipal police.” This surely was a joke. I figured it was a scare tactic and then after the officials finished with their bullying, we could get on with the study.
Suddenly, cameras were flashing, video cameras were taping, and lights were blinding my eyes. I saw the officials remove Kuen Sy, the house owner, along with his son, Bonleurt. The officials were looking at the paperwork that was presented to them, and Kuen Sy and Bonleurt did not show any sign of being intimidated.
As this was going on outside, a few of the brethren left the assembly to visit the bathroom, as if they knew they might not have the freedom to do so again soon. I thought, If I only had a cell phone, I would go to the bathroom and call someone!
They then asked if any foreigners were at the meeting. That was my first reality check. I had not really thought of myself as a foreigner but I was.
After 45 minutes of much talk back and forth, it was decided that the five foreigners in the room would be taken away first: a French woman by the name of Ann, one Thai gentleman and visiting preacher, Udorn, and three Americans – Ken Fox, Jerry and me.
The expressions on the faces of my Laotian friends did not seem troubled about the situation. As I left, Bontavay said, “See you later.” The brethren knew that no matter what the outcome, their faith was in the Lord, and He would see them through.
The Bible studies of the precious few days were now coming alive. The examples from Acts, Romans and Revelation were fresh on our minds and provided the strength to endure. We were told that we were being escorted to the international prison and to give the policeman our keys. The five foreigners loaded into our truck and Ken’s van.
We could barely keep from laughing as the policeman driving Ken’s van choked and chugged along in the unfamiliar vehicle. To my surprise, we were taken to a real prison. Confusion followed as the officials were not sure if they should put us behind the 15-foot, barbed-wire topped fence, complete with armed guards, or deliver us to the front office of the compound where less vile offenders are usually interrogated. After much conversation, it was decided we should be banished, vehicles and all, behind the enormous iron gate.
Ann and I were then separated from the three men, and the questioning began – Ann first and then me. I was frisked and asked if I was hiding any possessions such as jewelry or contraband. I questioned whether this severe treatment was really necessary, telling them that I was a Christian and not a threat to them.
Later I realized that all Christians are a threat to anything evil. After the first round of interrogation, I asked, “Why am I at this place? What have I done wrong?” I got no response.
My next worry was finding a bathroom. I asked for what I needed, just as the Scripture tells us to do, but the reply was no. Okay, I thought, I can do this. God always provides and He will see me through this ordeal.
Ann and I were then taken to a cell to spend the night. The room was very small, 8-by-10 feet, with a raised wooden platform for sleeping. Bars were on the windrows and doors, but the cell was remarkably clean and not offensive.
Our five other cell mates were pleasant. The night was quite cold, and they willingly shared their blankets and pillows with us.
The other prisoners asked if we were comfortable, and this time I meekly asked if there was a bathroom. Much to my astonishment, one was right there in the cell. The reason I had been inspired to wear a skirt instead of slacks that night then became apparent. Asian-style toilets are much more conducive to skirts. Again, the Lord had taken care of my needs.
Once more they asked if we were comfortable, and again I decided to be honest and tell them my feet were cold. They all laughed and muttered something back and forth, and a pair of socks appeared. My faith was growing by leaps and bounds.
After the lights were turned off, I pretended to sleep. For a long time, I could heard Ann telling the other women about what had transpired at the Bible study. As she spoke in Laotian, I listened to the words “Bible,” “brethren”, “faith” and “Jesus” and experienced a calmness as she shared with them the Good News about Jesus Christ.
With the morning came hopes of being released. The women shared their bananas, bread and water. I found comfort in their assurance that “the U.S. Embassy is very strong; you will not be here for long.”
Not knowing whether our plight was known to anyone outside the prison, I was beginning to understand the scripture explaining that my citizenship is in heaven and that “neither death nor life, nor angles nor principalities, nor powers nor things present nor things to come, nor height nor depth, nor any other created thing, shall be able to separate us from the love of God” (Romans 8:38 NKJV)
We were taken from the international prison to the municipal building for more questioning. As we waited our turn for more interrogation, Ann and I were astounded by the arrival of one of our Laotian sisters in Christ, Phonsawan. She brought oranges and a smile bigger than Texas.
We were elated to see her. But sadness overcame us as she told us that many of the Laotian brethren, including her husband, also had been taken to jail.
As we talked and relived the events of the last 24 hours, we laughed and cried and embraced. I felt helpless, seeing her all alone and nine months pregnant, having to bear the heavy burden of caring for all of her imprisoned brethren.
The Lord found much favor in her because of the great responsibility He had placed upon her. That Jerry, Ken and Udorn had been placed in separate rooms and were not able to visit with Phonsawan caused me to be sad. She was a ray of sunshine in that dismal nightmare.
Later that afternoon, the questioning became more intense. An interpreter was present, and the first phrase from his lips was, “I think you will cooperate with us, and this will go smoothly.”
As he began speaking in a kind, gentle way, I thought, Don’t have too much confidence in this wolf in sheep’s clothing. It’s probably one of the approaches he was taught in Interrogation 101 class. Even Satan looks appealing when he is trying to reel you in.
As I answered the questions, it was apparent by the expression on his face that he did not believe what I was telling him about the reason our group had been meeting. But Jerry had told me to be perfectly honest.
We left the municipal building that evening for our new accommodations. It is my belief that they waited until dark to take us so we could not see the filth of the place. It did have air conditioning and running water sometimes, but the facility was filled with mosquitoes, ants, dirt and a trash can that had not been emptied for years. That night for only the second time since our capture, we were given bread and water, and it was very satisfying.
We were told to leave the light on so when the guards came to check on us, they could see we had not escaped. And they did check the cell about every 30 minutes.
Before we turned in for bed, however, were asked what we would like for breakfast and told we would have to pay for it. We were glad to pay for the food, because by this time we were getting very hungry.
Sunday arrived, and still no word came about whether anyone anywhere knew we were in jail. Regardless, it was to be a day of worship and remembering the Lord’s sacrifice. We were given back our possessions, and I was blessed to receive my Bible and Laotian songbook.
Ann and I read scriptures and decided to remember the Lord’s suffering by partaking of some bread and drinking water. We prayed and sang songs for a couple of hours.
Soon the curiosity of the guards could no longer be controlled, and they entered our room to observe our ceremony and to ask questions. Ann took this opportunity to share the Good News again. After we were once again alone, we felt uplifted and encouraged as we read the trials of David and Paul. For the first time we could completely relate to some of the prayers they expressed.
Later, we were interrogated again, and the day dragged on. That evening the guards seemed to soften a bit, and we were asked if there was anything we needed. Ann made a list, and on Monday, the fourth day of confinement, Christmas arrived for Ann and me. A sack came with a bar of soap, bottle of shampoo, towel, toothbrush, tube of toothpaste, deck of cards, and two pairs of underwear – they were two sizes too small, but it was a nice gesture.
After the gifts were given, along with our morning meal of rice soup, several of the guards began cleaning up. A few swipes of the broom were made, and two days of accumulated sacks of trash were thrown out of our window onto the ground. We suspected something was about to happened and prayed it would be a visit from the U.S. Embassy.
After the Monday interrogation session, we were able to be together with the men for a short time. They had been separated from us the entire time, and it was good to see Jerry again.
At 3 p.m. on the fourth day, we were allowed to meet with approximately 13 Laotian government officials and Mr. Jess, a representative from the U. S. Embassy. He assured us that everything was being done to secure our release and informed us of the details that had begun the moment they knew about our arrest.
My eyes filled with tears at that moment, and I recalled Philippians 4:8: “Finally brethren, whatever things are true, whatever things are noble, whatever things are just, whatever things are lovely, whatever things are of good report, if there is any virtue and if there is anything praiseworthy – meditate on these things.”
The scripture kept my mind from what I was tempted to reflect upon. Later that evening, Jerry and I were taken by the authorities to our house to gather personal items and food.
After we arrived, Jerry sat at the kitchen table with three of the escorting officers while I went upstairs. Although we had been denied phone calls for four days, I was determined to call home to let them know that we were unharmed and not to worry.
My main concern was that my mother would miss my scheduled weekly phone call and wonder why I had neglected to telephone her. Little did I know that she and the rest of the world already knew about our plight. I was so nervous that I locked the keys and my glasses in the house and forgot most of what we were there to gather.
After arriving back at the detention facility, we were told that the interrogation was completed, the materials were being assimilated, and that we would soon know the outcome of this tragedy.
That night was more peaceful with anticipation of the following day bringing our release. As I rested on my bed, I could only think of how wonderful it was in this war of good and evil to be in the Christian regiment. King Jesus, Head of command, had a strategic plan all laid out. No matter how long the war raged, we would win.
Tuesday arrived, and we waited for an interminable amount of time. Instead of release though, the interrogators returned to further question Jerry, Ken and Udorn. After the session was over, we conspired about how to contact the outside world. Finally, at about 5 p.m., Mr. Jess arrived with two vehicles to collect us.
We were concerned about the release of the Thai and French nationals, and Mr. Jess took it upon himself to release them from prison also. He told us he was taking a great risk, but he was willing to try. Again, the Lord was with us.
During the ride to the U. S. Embassy for briefing, Mr. Jess informed us for the first time about all the publicity that had surrounded this incident. This time I could not hold back tears on hearing the recognition the Lord had received through the incarceration of a few Christians in far away Vientiane, Laos. Although released from custody, we were only given seven days to pack up and leave the country. The farewells with the Laotian brethren who had not been arrested were difficult.
Thirty of the people we were closest to were still in prison, and to leave without seeing them and with no assurance of ever seeing them again in this lifetime was a torture much greater than being in jail. The great joy of returning to my physical family and the wonderful church family in Fort Smith has been deadened by the dull reality that the Lao brethren remain in prison.
After two weeks, 17 of the 30 brethren were finally released. But as of April 6, we have just received news of the sentencing of the 13 still imprisoned. Eight prisoners have been sentenced to three years, two to one year, and three – all of whom are innocent grandmothers – were sentenced to serve an additional two months.
I count it a joy to have shared in a small way this experience with the Laotian brethren. My fellow brothers and sisters in Christ in Veintiane, especially the 13 still in prison and their families, continue today to suffer for their faith in the Lord Jesus Christ.
May we all fervently pray that the will of the Father be done, and that His will is for the speedy release of the Laotian Christians and the recognition of their right to assemble to worship the Creator and His Son.
This story was written in loving memory of Lou Porter, who was instrumental in beginning the Laotian work in Fort Smith, Arkansas. Lou served as a grandmother to many of the Laotian families. She was killed in an automobile accident March 3, 1998, as the events in the above article were unfolding.
Copyright © 1998, Christian Woman
Above article reprinted with permission of Meg Canfield, author, and Sandra Humphrey, editor.
Posted by Roy on February 22, 1998 under Articles
The Psalmist said, “Through thy precepts I get understanding: therefore I hate every false way” (Psalm 119:104).
Today, there is a tendency to play down sin. Here are some examples:
- Homosexuality is referred to as an “alternative life style.”
- Legalized abortion, in my opinion, is the greatest catastrophe in America since we became a nation. Millions of unborn babies are murdered annually, all because we do not realize how much God hates sin.
How much God hates sin can be seen in the punishment of sin in the past. In the Garden of Eden (Genesis 3:15-19):
- The serpent – condemned to destruction.
- The woman – condemned to submission and pain.
- The man – condemned to toil and tears.
- All men – condemned to death (1 Corinthians 15:22).
The Flood: In Genesis 6, we see the condition of man’s heart, that it was evil continually.
- God’s solution – the flood. He will destroy mankind along with the creatures. Why? All because of sin; God hates sin.
Sodom and Gomorrah (Genesis 19).
- These cities were destroyed along with their inhabitants because of the sin of sodomy (homosexuality) and other sins (Ezekiel 16:49).
Many other examples could be cited, but these are enough to show that God hates sin, and that he punishes it without mercy when men continue in it. We can see how much God hates sin by the future punishment he has promised to the wicked. Please read 2 Peter 2:4-9).
We can see how much God hates sin by looking at what he has done to redeem us from it. He sent his Son to earth to die on a cross to condemn sin and to make us righteous (Rom. 8:3-4). He sent his Son to save his people from their sins (Matt. 1:21). He made his Son, who knew no sin, to be sin that we might be made righteous (2 Cor. 5:21). He sent his son to bear our sins in his body that we might be dead to sin (1 Peter 2:24).
These passages not only teach now much God hates sin but also how much he loves us. God hates sin so much that he commands that we turn from it. He loves us so much that he sent his Son to die for us (John 3:16).
Let us, “Hate every false way.” This is possible only by loving God with all our heart, soul, mind and strength.
Posted by Roy on February 1, 1998 under Articles
As seen from the book of Revelation, the saints in John’s time were undergoing a great trial of persecution. They needed encouragement and assurance that they might face up to these trials.
The Lord gives them this encouragement when he said, “Be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life” (2:10). This seems to be the purpose of the book. He expands this by showing the ultimate triumph of the Kingdom.
In 7:9, he gives us a glimpse of the Kingdom beyond the grave. A great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations, and kindreds, and people, and tongues, stood before the throne, and before the Lamb, clothed with white robes, and palms in their hands. The angel said to John, “These are they which came out of great tribulation and have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb. Therefore, they are before the throne of God, and serve Him day and night in His temple. And he that setteth on the throne shall dwell among them. They shall hunger no more, neither thirst anymore.
John spoke of himself as being a companion of those who were undergoing tribulation in the Kingdom (1:9). With this revelation, they could look forward to victory beyond the grave. “O grave, where is thy victory?”
John said, “. . . I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held: And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth? And white robes were given unto every one of them; and it was said unto them, that they should rest yet for a little season . . .” (6:9-11). These were slain, yet they lived; they were now comforted. Things were good now, but they will get better. This is why the Spirit said, “Blessed are the dead which die in the Lord from henceforth: yea, saith the Spirit, that they may rest from their labors; and their works do follow them” (14:13-14).
God promises that, “He that overcometh shall inherit all things” (Rev. 21:7). The souls under the alter haven’t inherited all things yet. They don’t have perfect peace and happiness because they haven’t been avenged. But in Chapter 20, the Great Day comes when the wicked are judged, and along with Satan, are cast into the lake of fire where the beast and false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night forever and ever.
Then John saw the final triumph of the faithful; the holy city coming down from God out of heaven and a great voice out of heaven saying, “Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God. And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away” (21:3-4). “And there shall be no night there; and they need no candle, neither light of the sun; for the Lord God giveth them light: and they shall reign for ever and ever” (21:5). “Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city” (22:14).
So we see from this the destiny of the redeemed: perfect fellowship with God (21:1-8); perfect protection by God (21:9-27); and perfect provision from God (22:1-5).
“Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honour and power: for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created” (Rev. 4:11).
God had the eternal kingdom in mind before the foundation of the world (Eph. 1:4). Instead of Satan hindering the purpose of God, he only put God’s people through a refining fire to purify them for that eternal realm with God.
The wonderful thing about it all is, it is not only for the saints in the first century, but, “whosoever will, let him come and take of the water of life freely.” We, too, can overcome by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of his testimony, if we love not our life unto death (Rev. 12:11). We are made clean by the blood of the Lamb, by being baptized into his death (Rom. 6:3-4). And his blood continues to cleanse us as we walk in the light and have fellowship one with another.
Walking in the light includes proclaiming his word (testimony). Because we are debtors (Rom. 1:14-16), we owe an eternal debt of love to our fellowman. We must show this love by telling him about the blood of the Lamb, and the word of his testimony. Then we must give our bodies as living sacrifices unto God (Rom. 12:1-2). We must crucify the old man and let Jesus live in us (Gal. 2:20).
If we are with the Lamb, victory is assured. These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful.
Voltaire, a French philosopher and skeptic of two centuries ago, said that he “hated life and dreaded death.” How different from the Christian! Voltaire had nothing to look forward to, but the Christian everything.
Christianity spans two worlds, time and eternity. Time is needed to prepare for eternity, to know Christ, “and the power of his resurrection, and the fellowship of his sufferings” (Phil. 3:10). But we must keep in mind “our citizenship is in heaven.” We cannot be heavenly minded unless we are conscious of our heavenly citizenship and that we are only sojourners on earth. We must not, while sojourning among the ungodly, become ungodly, but remember that we are the salt and light of the earth.
As the Christian closes the book of Revelation, he understands how he can be content with his lot in life. The words of the Spirit, “Rejoice in the Lord always and again, I say rejoice” (Phil. 4:4) has meaning. What can he say to the ungodly? Groan, and again I say groan, for the misery that will come upon you. Why? Because they have united with Satan and “the God of peace shall bruise Satan” under the saints’ feet shortly (Rom. 16:20)!
The Christian looks backward to God’s promise in Eden to bruise the Serpent’s head (Gen. 3:15) and forward to its perfect fulfillment in the Serpent’s being “cast into the lake of fire and brimstone (Rev. 20:10), and praises Christ because he is counted worthy to suffer with him. “Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood, And hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father; to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen” (Rev. 1:5).
Holy Father, we praise you and thank you for allowing us to be a part of your Son’s “Indestructible Kingdom.”
Posted by Roy on July 6, 1997 under Articles
There have been more changes in our lifetime than in any other period in the history of the world — changes in travel, communications, medical science, education, etc.
Our present world is dreaming and planning for a more modern age. The world will continue to change with a more rapid pace. But does this mean we need a new gospel for the new age? Many modernists think so. They think the Bible, as it is, is not adapted to man as he is.
Can we take the inspired writer, Jude, seriously when he says, “Contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all delivered to the saints?” Yes! Man has not changed. We live in a changing world, but man remains basically the same. His needs and desires are the same. He is still flesh and spirit. His body still needs water, food, air, and sunshine. We are still dying spiritually because of our sin (Romans 6:23) and the only power to save our soul is the gospel (Romans 1:16; James 1:21).
Man is still struggling with the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eye, and the pride of life (1 John 2:15-17). No man in this modern age is tempted any more or less than men were in the first century. Man’s adversary, the devil, has not changed; he still walks about seeking whom he may devour (1 Peter 5:8). Satan still works today, as he always has, through agents who appear as servants of God. The Bible says, And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light. It is not surprising, then, if his servants masquerade as servants of righteousness. Their end will be what their actions deserve (2 Cor. 11:14-15).
The message that “we need a new gospel for the new age” is from Satan and not from God. The simple gospel of Christ met every need in the first century and it will meet man’s every need as long as the world stands.
All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work (2 Tim. 3:16-17).
Posted by John on January 1, 1997 under Articles
Many people accept the idea of God but do not accept the God revealed in the Old Testament. They do not believe in the factual nature of the Old Testament. Will being “a church that does good and has nice people in it” convince anyone? No, for this could describe any humanitarian organization such as the Lion’s Club, etc. What about the argument that the world was created? No, that merely shows the reasonableness that a God exists. It does not tell which God or describe that God in detail. What is needed is some way to test the factual nature of the Old Testament.
THE OLD TESTAMENT IS EVENT-CENTERED
First, Not all religions are event-based. Buddhism, Confucianism, Hinduism, etc., are all “teachings” that are not based in any historical events in the same way the Old Testament is. There is not this string of people, places and things like in the Old Testament narratives. Further, the “gods” of these religions do not “enter history” as the God of the Bible does. Being event-based is important because if a writing claims to be true historically, then it’s contents should be verifiable as far as one is able to check.
(Note: an excellent resource to contrast world religions is The Compact Guide to World Religions, by Halverson, ed.)
Second, as with any world view, it will ultimately rest on faith. But it will not be blind faith. It will be faith founded on fact. And if the God of the Bible is the true One, then faith is the key principle (Hebrews 11).
HISTORICAL ARCHEOLOGY IS THE KEY METHOD
First, it is not physical/biological science that gets the starring role in evidences. Many seem to think that physical/biological science is the star because this is how the case for creation is established. However, showing creation to be logical doesn’t say one thing about the truth of the Old Testament narratives to the contrast of other world views. As such, the physical/biological sciences are very limited as evidence.
Second, historical events require historical verification. Artifacts, papers, and reason all enter into the picture. So, archeological evidences are superior to those from the “creation sciences” to establish faith in the factuality of the Old Testament.
Outstanding Old Testament events include not only creation but also the Flood, Tower of Babel, Call of Abraham, the Egyptian sojourn and EXODUS, the Sinai –event, conquest, kingdom, captivity and return narratives. All these are packed with names of people, places and cultural color. Does archeology verify the Old Testament along these lines?
As a side note: First, the use of the term “verify” is used in the place of “proof” because none of us were present to actually see or witness the events (which would be “proof” for us). We are limited to just making checks at available points along the line. If a number of these checks pan out, then we have reason to believe in the factuality of the document. Hence, we verify points along the line rather than “prove the entire line”. Second, there is always some uncertainty in the “facts” we gather. This does not mean our facts are worthless, it means that everything has a specific level of certainty associated with it. Facts are just items that have a high degree of certitude to them. Third, to establish a case, we always wish that more pieces of the puzzle were available. For example, even if one had a 100 piece puzzle of the Statue of Liberty and 12 pieces were missing in a random way, one could still “get the picture” with a good degree of certainty but we naturally wish all the pieces were present. The same holds true for any type of investigation.
WHAT ARE SOME ARCHEOLOGICAL VERIFICATIONS?
First, it is important to note that faith is in the picture. It will be faith in the testimony of the archeologists that guide us. And there are three very good works in this area that any library would benefit from having. They are (1) The New Unger’s Bible Handbook, revised by G.N. Larson, (Moody Press). This is an excellent work. It surveys the Bible and gives archeological “finds” that help illuminate the text. There is much use of color photos/charts and maps. (2) Genesis and Archeology, by Howard F. Vos, (Moody). Even though it contains B/W pictures, it still is very informative and easy to read. (3) Archeology and Bible History, by Free and Vos, (Zondervan). This is an up-to-date work by noted archeologists/scholars. It follows the Bible-line of history and that makes it very useful. The work is in-depth and authoritative.
CASE STUDIES
- Sodom and Gomorrah:
- Genesis 14 tells of five cities around the Salt Sea that are located close to tar pits. It is a fact that oil-based material does appear in considerable quantities around the southern end of the Dead Sea.1, 2a As such, today no one wants to live there. But excavations have shown that the area was densely populated in the past.3 Further, Josephus, the Jewish historian, writing at the end of the first century, said that traces of the five cities could still be seen at that time.2b This is independent, corroborative, testimony that verifies the Bible statement of cities being around the southern end of the Dead Sea.
- The area also contained lots of salt, free sulfur (“brimstone”) and oil deposits. Coupled with earthquakes common to the area, this could account for the origin of the fire and brimstone “raining down from heaven.”4 While there are still many details to be worked out, it is clearly seen that the Bible statements do have a factual base. Hence, faith in the story of Gen 14 and 19 are fully justified.
- The Bitter Waters of Marah:
In Ex 15:23 it is stated that the Israelites could not drink the water because it “was bitter.” How can water be “bitter”? Does this statement have a basis in fact? Yes, most certainly. When water is “bitter” it usually contains dissolved minerals. These are some of the same kind found in well water–calcium and magnesium. How can “bitter water” be made “sweet” (un-bitter)? Maybe the “tree” that Moses threw in had some property that could “catch” all the minerals responsible for making the water bitter. Some forms of cellulose (a constituent of wood) are able to work in this way and are used to “soften” water today.5 We do not know what actually occurred, but we can be confident that what is being told is not some fable. The writer of the story made true observations that are backed up by current knowledge. In short, the testimony rings true.
- The Ark:
Using the measurements of the ark given by the Bible and the average distance of a cubit, engineers have calculated the size, stability and design of the ark. It is now know that these are not just haphazard numbers that some story-teller might have cooked up, but that they show the sign of intelligent design.6
- The Exodus:
Here is where the story goes in a different direction. First, it is standard knowledge that the Egyptians had many “gods” and that even the Pharaoh was a “god.” Second, common sense tells us that no nation is going to build monuments that brag about how they got defeated, especially if was by a bunch of their slaves!! And this would even be more difficult to admit if the very “gods” of their nation were defeated (and they were)! Hence, one would naturally expect the Egyptians to actually “say nothing” of the Exodus. It can almost be imagined that it would be a political mistake to erect a monument or build some sort of Egyptian “billboard” (technical: stela) to that effect. Further, it would be expected that if anything was said about the Hebrews, it would be sarcastic. What is expected is actually what is observed. No monuments or discussion of the Exodus have been found. The Egyptians literally kept their mouths shut about it. However, in the context shown, their silence speaks loudly!
Later on, where Israel is mentioned in an Egyptian monument, it is a “put down.” For example, in the case of Merneptah,7 the successor of Ramesses II, he boasted of his victory over the people of Palestine (and he names Israel). The monument of this victory has a sarcastic tone to it as per Israel. After the Exodus and “overthrow” of Egyptian gods, the sarcasm toward Israel is perfectly reasonable.
Hence, it is seen that Egyptians report and boast of victory and are silent as a graveyard about defeat! Nothing in archeology contradicts the Old Testament record as per the Exodus.
WHAT IS THE CONCLUSION OF THE MATTER?
First, Nelson Glueck, the renowned Jewish archeologist, said that “it may be stated categorically that no archeological discovery has ever controverted a biblical reference” (from Rivers in the Desert; History of Neteg. Philadelphia: Jewish Publications Society of America, 1969, page 31).
Second, Wm. F. Albright, another highly respected archeologist, has this to say “. . . discovery after discovery have established the accuracy of innumerable details, and has brought increased recognition to the value of the Bible as a source of history” (from The Archeology of Palestine. Rev. ed. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Pelican Books, 1960).
Third, the two men mentioned above are not known to be conservatives, hence their testimony carries greater weight.
So, we can have full confidence in the Old Testament as history. Faith can be founded on fact and not feeling.
REFERENCES
- Vos, Howard F., Genesis and Archeology, Chicago: Moody
- Whitson, Complete Works of Flavius Josephus. Grand Rapids: Kregel, 1963 (a) “Antiquities 1:9”, (b) “Wars of the Jews” 4:8.4
- Free and Vos, Archeology and Bible History, revised ed. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1992 (p. 52)
- Unger, The New Unger’s Bible Handbook, Chicago: Moody, 1984 (pp. 23, 52)
- Stock and Rice, Chromatographic methods, Chapman and Hall, 1967
- Reference available on request. It contains the calculations by an engineer as per the ark and includes tests of stability for water vessels.
- Pfeiffer, Charles ed., The Biblical World, Grand Rapids: Baker (p. 380ff)
?
Posted by John on under Articles
Why do people not accept the Old Testament world view as truth? Those who do accept the message of the Old Testament as truth, it is the very foundation for life and understanding the New Testament writings (Rom 15:4, Hebrews). But for others it is the foundation for nothing.
WHY DO SOME NOT BELIEVE?
First, many believe that the idea of God is just a human concoction. That is, God is just inferred in order to explain “mysteries.” These people point out that all religions have this one thing in common. Hence, writings, sacred books, etc., are all based on human imagination or ideas.
The above is not totally false. The idea that a God exists comes from the human mind. How else could it come about? Man sees nature, man infers, man concludes . . . that is the way man learns about the surety of God’s existence (Rom 1:19ff).
It is also true that many, like Shirley MacLaine, have written books that tell about having contact with a Someone “out there.” Plus the cults have their sacred books. The Greeks had their whole team of gods and wrote about them. So, it is also true that men have created writings to go along with their “religious” claims. Often it is not the idea that God exists that is disputed but the factuality of the Old Testament that is disputed. It is simply lumped together with all other “sacred books” and labeled “myth.”
Second, there is this thing of personal autonomy. That is, the desire to rule one’s self. In general, everyone wants to have his/her own way on a matter. It is hard to submit to authority, admit mistakes, and “line up” with how someone else sees it. Everyone has a natural desire to do things that are right in one’s own eyes. To believe in the Old Testament world view would put one into a dilemma because, in the Bible, it is an act of rebellion against God to follow one’s own self instead of submitting to God (Jer 17:15, Prov 3:7, Deut 12:8; and the case of Nadab and Abihu, Lev 10:1-3). So, to keep one’s independence, the Bible is simply rejected as are all other types of religions that are authority-based.
Third, there is this tension between the wrath of God and the love of God that affects people. On a recent program of “48-Hours,” George Carlin, the cynic comic, explained to the audience the “absurdity” of God. He tells them that there is this invisible man up there that watches everything you do. And that He has 10 things you ought not do . . . because if you do them He will send you to a screaming, burning Hell forever . . . (Carlin pauses) . . . and then this God tells you He loves you!! Of course, there were rounds of laughter and applause. To believers, Carlin is a fool, but to the audience he is wise. How can Carlin’s view of God be changed? What about his audience? If they see good works being done by the church would that prove that the God of the Bible is real and that the Old Testament is factual? No. What if they hear a sermon on self-esteem? Of course not. Will seeing “vibrant worship” do it? Hardly. What about preaching about the God revealed in the Old Testament? No. Nothing will change until Carlin and others believe in the factuality of the Old Testament . . . only then can you “talk content.”
Fourth, some sincerely ask why doesn’t God just speak to us directly as He did in the Old Testament. Why does He hide Himself if He really wants us to believe? So, this “hide-and seek” stuff really frustrates people and makes them just say, “Forget it!” We understand their frustration.
Fifth, there is this thing of not being able to find the truth on a religious matter. Since everyone thinks differently, because of his/her environment it is argued, that prevents them from ever agreeing on anything. That is, one’s outlook can never be changed by facts. Hence, one world view, religion, or expression of Christianity is just as valid as another. So, the “search is off” as far as looking into the world view of the Old Testament and finding out what it really says. Islam, Samaritanism, Mormonism, Deism, Animism, etc., are all equally valid expressions of man’s search for God-based outlooks pre-determined by culture. (This whole issue is called Post-modernism, and religious Pluralism is its fruit.)
MORE REASONS TO DOUBT
Some have heard either shaky evidences to prove the truth of the Old Testament or some laughable teachings that are supposedly what the Old Testament says that have caused doubt to prevail.
example 1) Isaiah 40:22 says that God sits above the circle of the earth. Many of us have heard this quoted as “proof of inspiration” because it foretold the ball shape of the earth before its discovery. But plates are round . . . and flat. If the earth had this shape, God could still sit above the “circle of the earth” and look down. The point is that we are dealing again with picture-language and it is stretching it to make it say something about the shape of the earth. Remember, the Old Testament is to make us wise unto salvation and not wise as to how the universe goes (2 Tim 3:15).
example 2) One of the more recent and sincerely taught ideas is that before Adam sinned there was no death of any living thing on this planet. This means that in the garden nothing died. Think about this. If Adam stepped on a roly-poly bug or ant or grub or worm, it would not die. There would be no food chains where big fish eat smaller fish etc. In fact, there would be no “humus” in the garden because it is decaying organic matter! The people that teach this are those involved in the Institute for Creation Science. Dr. Henry Morris is one of the leading expositors of this view. This is another case of “stretching it” too far as per the language of Genesis.
example 3) Sincere people say that they have found Noah’s ark. Maybe. But according to Dr. Harvey Porter, a respected archeologist and Christian, no archeologist of repute is an “arkeologist” or gives credence to their claims. The fact of the flood is not being disputed . . . it is the finding of the ark that is being questioned. In fact, the recent television program “In Search of Noah’s Ark” was found out to be filled with fraud. This made national news. “Bogus facts” do not help the cause.
example 4) The local newspaper here ran a section asking local ministers to give reasons why they believe in God. Some were good but others were dreadfully shallow. One preacher used most of his space to talk of his trip to Scotland and then told us that he believed in God because he saw a rainbow and that only God could make a rainbow. Actually kids in the backyard with a water-hose can make a rainbow. And that is probably what most people came up with. So the “evidence” fell flat as a flitter. When presenting evidences to the public, we need to spend time on the topic and get to the point.
example 5) Most of us who were in college about 25 years ago probably heard about N.A.S.A. computer experts finding the “missing day of Joshua.” This writer remembers trying to locate more information on the subject. It seems like every church bulletin and preacher mentioned it. It turned out to be a hoax (probably made by the same people that cooked up the “Search Noah’s Ark” T.V. special). We’ve got to make sure that what we say can be documented and is backed by competent research.
THE CHURCH NEEDS TO BE MORE AGGRESSIVE IN LAYING DOWN REASONS TO BELIEVE
First, the problem today is UNBELIEF. So preaching God to the lost, letting them see our good works, being a good neighbor to the community, having lectureships on the family and marriage, etc., PROVE NOTHING and DO NOTHING to lay a solid foundation for having a faith based on fact. True, the church is to be full of “good works” (Eph 2:10), but a cornerstone of the edifice has been left out . . . and that is preaching the FACTUAL BASIS FOR THE BIBLE!!
Second, people will believe something. Everyone has a world view. It is an act of faith. But some world views are not EVENT-BASED as the Old Testament is. In fact, the Judeo-Christian religion is unique by having a historical base. Our God acted in real-life and things were recorded and can be looked into. Being event-based, it is an umbrella for people, places, and things. We CAN assemble facts and establish reasons for faith.
Third, the church around here has focused on ” being a good neighbor” and providing a “place where visitors see how warm we are.” We also want to preach “hope.” People need “hope.” But “hope must have its reasons.” We are hitting all these important areas to the virtual . . . abject neglect of providing REASONS TO BELIEVE! Sure, someone may “join our club” by getting wet in the water but is it BLIND FAITH that motivates them? Is it responding to “warm fuzziness” or FACTS? (Please do not misunderstand . . . congregations need to be warm and have a sense of community, but if this is the hook to get them in, then our hook is just “warmer” than the cult down the street. The issue is DO WE HAVE A FACTUAL BASIS FOR EXISTING?? People need to know!)
Fourth, someone has said that a faith unexamined is not worth having. That is true. But the current movement of the church today is to dish out to the public a teaching that they are expected to swallow without giving them any solid evidence that it is the truth. Hence, if they respond, they have an unexamined faith. And what if the “warm-fuzziness” of the congregation fizzles? Then those people are gone. They had no roots. They never were shown that what they believed is backed up by evidence as is no other religion. Church leaders need to get their head out of the “warm-fuzzy” sand and act on the reality of the present situation.
CONCLUSION
This article has tried to show why some refuse to believe in the Old Testament world view and that some still doubt because they have heard very inadequate reasons for believing. Finally, it is advised that the church here (and elsewhere) get to the task of challenging unbelief and providing reasons to believe to those who are lost.
Posted by John on under Articles
- Mode of baptism? (New Testament written in Greek) Greek words are:* rhantizo = sprinkle* cheo = pour
* baptizo = immerse
Which word does God specify in the Great Commission (Mt 28:18-20)?
- We follow Christ and His teachings and not the Old Testament teachings (Matt 28:20)?* OT points to Christ (Col 2:16, 17)* OT only a shadow of the true (Heb 10:1)
* Hence, the first (OT) in order to set in place the second (NT) [Heb 10:9]
* Apostles taught the teaching of Christ (Matt 28:20, Acts 2:42)
* The Sabbath, special priesthood, instrumental music all were a part of the OT system and are replaced with what they pointed to.
- Instrumental music?
- no one who read the NT for 500 years got the idea that God asked for it.
- the Greek Orthodox Church still hasn’t found it even though they read the NT in the original Greek language like we read a newspaper (this can be documented). Hence, they sing acapella.
* God specifically asked for it in the OT (2 Chron 29:25, 26).
* God never asked for it in the NT. If so, where is the passage?
* Pope Vitalian (a mere man) put it in about 500 years after the church was established and under much protest (this can be documented). This proves that:
* If God is our Father, then He would like our love and trust. Shall we trust Him and give Him just what He asked for or what we ask for and want? (see 1 Cor 4:6).
* note the CONTRAST between what God asked for in OT worship and what He asked for in NT worship as per music.
- One-man pastor system?
* Apostles put “elders” (plural) in churches (Acts 14:23)
* Titus 1:5 gives qualifications for installing “elders” (plural).
* Acts 20:17ff elders = overseers (NAS, bishops) = shepherds (Greek = pastor) therefore, all the same people = Group of pastors.
* Church has teachers that ought to be paid (Gal 6:6). They are commonly known as “preachers.” They are not the one-man pastor of the church. Yet, a teacher may be one of the pastors (1 Tim 5:17)
* Elders are men not women (Matt 10:2, Titus 1:6, 1 Tim 3:2)
* Men teach the assembled church (1 Tim 2:11ff, 1 Cor 14:34ff)
* Men and women may work together to tutor a person (Acts 18:26)
- Lord’s Supper on the Lord’s Day is the NT practice?* LS is a memorial to the death of Christ for our sins* The first day of the week is a memorial to His Resurrection = Lord’s Day
* The two events (death + Resurrection) are tied together (2 Cor 15:3, 4 and Rom 4:25); therefore, the memorials that reflect those events are logically tied together. And this is the practice seen in Acts 20:7. What other practice reflects the gospel like this one ? What other day would fit?
* Taking the LS each Lord’s Day, 52 times a year will cause a person to focus on what Christ has done for him on the cross and its verification by the Resurrection. This is result in true worship.
* Records from early church history confirm that the standard practice was to take the LS each Sunday (see E. Ferguson, Early Christians Speak)
- A “falling away” will occur. False doctrine will creep in and make changes?* Some will draw away disciples (Acts 20:30)* We must “hold fast” the traditions delivered to the early church (2 Thess 2:15). This means to contend for the faith that was once delivered (Jude 3).
* There can be no fellowship with those who want to change the apostolic teachings (Rom 16:17-18)
* THE CHURCH IS TO STAND FOR THE TRUTH as delivered (1 Tim 3:15)
* Church history give dates when the above practices (1-5) were changed by human wisdom (and with much controversy).
- Jesus is the “way, truth, and life” and exclusive way to God, the Father?* statement made (Jn 14:6)* belief in Him is necessary or one will not follow Him as the way (Jn 12:46)
* the way is not easy (Matt 16:24)
* but Jesus gives an invitation to come and bring your burdens (Matt 11:28)
* discipleship involves belief, repentance and is initially declared in baptism (Matt 28:19)
- Who is Jesus?* The true light (John 1:9)* He reveals God to us as God really is (Jn 1:18)
* He is “one with God” (John 14:10, Col 1:19)
* Full of grace and truth (1 Jn 1:14)
* King of Kings, Lord of Lords (Rev 19:18)
* Based on the above, He is ALL-AUTHORITATIVE in matters of religion (Matt 28:18)
- True Discipleship?* thinks like Jesus thinks (Phil 2:5).* follows His teachings (Matt 28:20, Lk 6:46)
* His teaching = the very words of God (John 8:28)
* Our goal = Jesus’ goal = to always please God (Jn 8:29, Jn 6:38)
* Seeks to glorify God and not self (Jn 8:50)
* If one believes, he obeys (John 3:36)
* But our obedience springs out from LOVE FOR JESUS (John 14:23). This is the bottom-line.
- Human wisdom is insufficient as a guide in matters of religion?* God’s thoughts are not man’s. It is best, therefore, to hear God on a matter or learn what pleases God (Isa 55:8-9).* In fact, what seems right to man may be that which leads to death (Prov 14:12)
* It is not in man to direct his own steps (NIV, Jer 10:23)
* Example: water won’t cleanse leprosy but God told Namaan to dip in water to be clean (2 Ki 5: 1-4). Only faith and trust in God effected his cure. He obeyed God and the leprosy left.
- God wants man to respect His word and not change it?
Ex: if God specifies “baptizo,” then immerse.
Ex: if has a design for the worship of the church that contrasts with the design of OT worship, then respect the design.
Ex: if God makes love for Him and love for man the basic foundation for our actions, then let’s not make “mere duty” the basis.
* do not put words in God’s mouth or remove words from what He says (Deut 4:2, 5:32)
* do not go beyond what has been written . . . God has spoken! (1 Cor 4:6).
* those who speak for God expect their word to remain unaltered (Rev 22:18)
- Jesus’ Words = Apostle’s Words?* They taught people how to do (observe) what Jesus commanded (Mt 28:18-20)* Jesus’ Word = God’s Word and He gave it to them (apostles) (John 8:28, 17:8)
* The apostles would be guided into all truth (John 14:26, 16:13, 14)
* Apostolic Word authority (1 Cor 2:11-13, 1 Cor 14:37, 2 Thess 2:15)
